South American Cities Codexery — Data & Quality

We publish our audit record because accuracy claims should be checkable. Every entry on this site runs through an automated fact-audit pipeline (accuracy audit → source-grounded repair → visual QA); this page is generated from that pipeline's own report, not written by hand.

Last full accuracy audit: 2026-09-06 · 10 entries checked · 8 flagged · 18 issues confirmed · 8 corrected · 10 still open

Recent findings (audit lane, verbatim)

Antofagasta — The area was part of the Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata, not the Viceroyalty of Peru, before Bolivian independence.

Antofagasta — The 1866 treaty was between Chile and Bolivia and did not transfer sovereignty; it established a demarcation line.

Aracaju — The entry states the metropolitan area includes Laranjeiras and Maruim, but the official Metropolitan Region of Aracaju does not include these municipalities.

Arica — The entry states 'Arica and Parinacot' but the correct name is 'Arica y Parinacota Region'

Arica — The entry says the city's name comes from the Kunza term arisca, meaning 'new bay', but this etymology is not widely confirmed and the origin is uncertain, often attributed to Aymara instead.

Bahía Blanca — The fortress was founded on the orders of Brigadier-General Juan Manuel de Rosas, who later became governor of Buenos Aires, but Rosas was already Governor of Buenos Aires at the time of the founding (he took office in December 1827, before April 1828).

Bahía Blanca — The entry claims the fortress was built to guard against the Brazilian navy, which had landed in the area the previous year, but there is no widely-known historical record of a Brazilian landing in the Bahía Blanca area in 1827.

Santiago de los Caballeros — The entry states the original settlement was founded in 1495 at Jacagua, but historically Santiago de los Caballeros was founded in 1495 by Christopher Columbus at the site of present-day Jacagua, though some sources cite the founding as 1495 or 1496; the phra

Santiago de los Caballeros — The entry says 'Another earthquake devastated the city on December 2, 1562, and survivors relocated to land adjacent to the Yaque del Norte River.' This is redundant and slightly inaccurate: the 1562 earthquake is the same event mentioned earlier (the one that

Sucre — The original name 'Ciudad de la Plata' is incomplete; the city was originally founded as 'Ciudad de la Plata de la Nueva Toledo' (or simply 'La Plata').

Sucre — The claim that Sucre was an Inca town called Chuquisaca prior to Spanish colonization is misleading; Chuquisaca was the Spanish name for the region, and the indigenous settlement was known as Chuqichaka or similar, but it was not a major Inca provincial capita

Trujillo, Peru — The entry states Trujillo is the 'second most populous city and center of the second most populous metropolitan area of Peru.' This is factually incorrect; as of widely known census data, Arequipa is the second most populous city and metropolitan area in Peru,

Trujillo, Peru — The entry states that the Congress of the Republic of Peru honored the city with the title 'Meritorious City and Faithful to the Fatherland' in 1821. The correct title granted by the Congress was 'Meritorious City and Faithful to the Fatherland' but it was awa

Viña del Mar — The widely accepted founding date of Viña del Mar is 31 May 1874, not 28 December 1874.

Viña del Mar — José Francisco Vergara was primarily a politician, writer, and businessman, not an engineer who brought the railroad; the railroad was built by an English company and inaugurated in 1855.

Open data

All content is fetchable as JSON at /data/content/ · llms.txt · sitemap

Corrections

Spotted an error? Suggest an edit — reader reports go straight into the audit queue.

← back to South American Cities